Comments on: MooTools Survey Results http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/ The Blog Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:31:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: SamGoody http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1604 SamGoody Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:10:13 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1604 <p>Great Job! Thanks for taking the time to organize and write up the results for the whole community.</p> Great Job! Thanks for taking the time to organize and write up the results for the whole community.

]]> By: Rouven Weßling http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1601 Rouven Weßling Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:53:09 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1601 <p>Maybe it is time for Mootools UI, it certainly would be a good home for HtmlTable. Also other stuff (Tips?) may better fit into something like this.</p> Maybe it is time for Mootools UI, it certainly would be a good home for HtmlTable. Also other stuff (Tips?) may better fit into something like this.

]]> By: Dustin Hansen http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1586 Dustin Hansen Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:03:06 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1586 <p>Personally I would like to see more be intergrated directly into the forge, and have forge have a more "more" like interface for building a script with all dependencies. I like most of the libraries in more, I just don't (again personally) think they necessarily differ that much from that of the forge libraries.</p> <p>Just my 0.02 though...</p> Personally I would like to see more be intergrated directly into the forge, and have forge have a more “more” like interface for building a script with all dependencies. I like most of the libraries in more, I just don’t (again personally) think they necessarily differ that much from that of the forge libraries.

Just my 0.02 though…

]]> By: Arian http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1560 Arian Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:47:24 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1560 <p>@Kevin Sweeney: Basically we're open for any new demo. We're planning to add a sort of an 'overview' page which lists all the demos that could be useful for existing users. A kind of a wishlist can be found here: https://github.com/mootools/mootools-demos/issues however there is not much yet, but if you've got an idea, create a ticket or fork the repository and add new demos! In the readme in the repository I wrote something which hopefully can get you started.</p> @Kevin Sweeney: Basically we’re open for any new demo. We’re planning to add a sort of an ‘overview’ page which lists all the demos that could be useful for existing users. A kind of a wishlist can be found here: https://github.com/mootools/mootools-demos/issues however there is not much yet, but if you’ve got an idea, create a ticket or fork the repository and add new demos! In the readme in the repository I wrote something which hopefully can get you started.

]]> By: Kevin Sweeney http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1557 Kevin Sweeney Tue, 01 Feb 2011 02:36:37 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1557 <p>Can there be more than one example to a demo? Or are you looking for demos for components that do not yet exist? If the latter, it would be super helpful to have a "wishlist" of items that need documenting! :)</p> Can there be more than one example to a demo? Or are you looking for demos for components that do not yet exist? If the latter, it would be super helpful to have a “wishlist” of items that need documenting! :)

]]> By: Sean http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1556 Sean Tue, 01 Feb 2011 01:52:38 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1556 <p>@Barryvan: An idea we've been kicking around is to move UI classes to the Forge and brand them "official", or "by MooTools". Something to let users know they're different. :)</p> @Barryvan: An idea we’ve been kicking around is to move UI classes to the Forge and brand them “official”, or “by MooTools”. Something to let users know they’re different. :)

]]> By: Barryvan http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1555 Barryvan Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:09:27 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1555 <p>I wouldn't mind seeing components like the HTMLTable and other UI controls split into a third "official" library. Although I don't use these sorts of components, I do agree with Brade in that libraries from the Forge don't appear to carry the same weight as those from the official site. When ART comes along, I'm guessing (hoping!) that it'll be another official library.</p> <p>Perhaps the simplest solution would be to have links on the MooTools download page to the official plugins released on the Forge. This way, they're still "official", but the main MooTools website stays nice and light on the downloads.</p> I wouldn’t mind seeing components like the HTMLTable and other UI controls split into a third “official” library. Although I don’t use these sorts of components, I do agree with Brade in that libraries from the Forge don’t appear to carry the same weight as those from the official site. When ART comes along, I’m guessing (hoping!) that it’ll be another official library.

Perhaps the simplest solution would be to have links on the MooTools download page to the official plugins released on the Forge. This way, they’re still “official”, but the main MooTools website stays nice and light on the downloads.

]]> By: Linnk http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1554 Linnk Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:09:39 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1554 <p>I really wanted that T-Shirt… ó_ò</p> <p>Btw, only 43% want to remove HtmlTable? I was thinking we would be most. Tables are not so popular these days, lol.</p> I really wanted that T-Shirt… ó_ò

Btw, only 43% want to remove HtmlTable? I was thinking we would be most. Tables are not so popular these days, lol.

]]> By: NKjoep http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1553 NKjoep Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:02:28 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1553 <p>.....soooo who's the winner? :€</p> …..soooo who’s the winner? :€

]]> By: Simon http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1552 Simon Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:24:52 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1552 <p>Gah, I meant API comments. Sorry</p> Gah, I meant API comments. Sorry

]]> By: Simon http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1551 Simon Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:24:26 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1551 <p>jQuery have just made plans to remove their API docs due to the amount of pointless comments and bug reports posted there. Might be something to think about</p> jQuery have just made plans to remove their API docs due to the amount of pointless comments and bug reports posted there. Might be something to think about

]]> By: Arian http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1550 Arian Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:03:54 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1550 <p>13% answered they use MooTools for their server-side needs. Because of MooTools' modularity we can continue to provide a Server-Side version in the future, so you can have all MooTools' goodies on your server as well!</p> 13% answered they use MooTools for their server-side needs. Because of MooTools’ modularity we can continue to provide a Server-Side version in the future, so you can have all MooTools’ goodies on your server as well!

]]> By: doubleTap http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1549 doubleTap Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:40:21 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1549 <p>What about the server-side version? I see a great case for api unification across both client and server through node.js and the other javascript based servers.</p> What about the server-side version? I see a great case for api unification across both client and server through node.js and the other javascript based servers.

]]> By: Rolf http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1548 Rolf Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:32:12 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1548 <p>mooftw good roundup. things like htmltable will be fine in forge with as long as forge will carry some sort "this plug is supported by the mooooooo team" badge star slapped on it. lol keep going strong, i wish i had more time.</p> mooftw good roundup. things like htmltable will be fine in forge with as long as forge will carry some sort “this plug is supported by the mooooooo team” badge star slapped on it. lol keep going strong, i wish i had more time.

]]> By: Arian http://mootools.net/blog/2011/01/31/survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1547 Arian Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:24:10 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=1238#comment-1547 <p>We are not going to remove anything soon and we'll continue to fix bugs. It's more an indication how we should categorize components and what we should focus on.</p> We are not going to remove anything soon and we’ll continue to fix bugs. It’s more an indication how we should categorize components and what we should focus on.

]]>