Comments on: MooTools 1.3 βeta 1 http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/ The Blog Mon, 20 May 2013 09:32:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Fábio Miranda Costa http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1056 Fábio Miranda Costa Mon, 03 May 2010 18:50:46 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1056 <p>@131 The mentioned problem has been fixed and will be on the next release of mootools. Thanks for pointing that out.</p> @131 The mentioned problem has been fixed and will be on the next release of mootools. Thanks for pointing that out.

]]> By: 131 http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1052 131 Mon, 03 May 2010 07:19:41 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1052 <p>http://fabian-beiner.de/slickspeed-selectors-test/ Well, Slick (in mt 1.3b1.1) seems to be 500% slower (IE8/XP) than the old selector engine (233ms for 1.2/ 1170ms for Slick - all good until nth-path pseudo selectors)... Great job in new Element("input#someID.someClass1.someClass2[disabled=true]") anyway !</p> http://fabian-beiner.de/slickspeed-selectors-test/ Well, Slick (in mt 1.3b1.1) seems to be 500% slower (IE8/XP) than the old selector engine (233ms for 1.2/ 1170ms for Slick - all good until nth-path pseudo selectors)… Great job in new Element(“input#someID.someClass1.someClass2[disabled=true]”) anyway !

]]> By: Pjb http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1040 Pjb Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:33:43 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1040 <p>Can i just ask why $chk was not a good idea? I use it frequently where i want to allow for 0 and don't want to write a shorter comparison statement. Seems to me it's very useful, but I can't understand why it would not be a good idea?!</p> Can i just ask why $chk was not a good idea? I use it frequently where i want to allow for 0 and don’t want to write a shorter comparison statement. Seems to me it’s very useful, but I can’t understand why it would not be a good idea?!

]]> By: Webstandard-Blog http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1039 Webstandard-Blog Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:36:28 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1039 <p>Thx for publishing the next mootools-version Valerio!</p> Thx for publishing the next mootools-version Valerio!

]]> By: Nypher http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1037 Nypher Fri, 30 Apr 2010 03:29:36 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1037 <p>Very cool! Haven't seen it yet but i'm going to have some fun. By the way is there any change with each(), i'm a bit worried since i've read a post by aaron that talket about "changes"?</p> Very cool! Haven’t seen it yet but i’m going to have some fun. By the way is there any change with each(), i’m a bit worried since i’ve read a post by aaron that talket about “changes”?

]]> By: Fabian Beiner http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1034 Fabian Beiner Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:58:14 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1034 <p>Rasmus, I've put a SlickSpeed online: http://fabian-beiner.de/slickspeed-selectors-test/</p> Rasmus, I’ve put a SlickSpeed online: http://fabian-beiner.de/slickspeed-selectors-test/

]]> By: Rasmus Fløe http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1032 Rasmus Fløe Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:40:23 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1032 <p>Yipee!</p> <p>Anyone got a Slickspeed/Taskspeed up and running yet with this beta in it?</p> Yipee!

Anyone got a Slickspeed/Taskspeed up and running yet with this beta in it?

]]> By: Brade http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1029 Brade Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:31:59 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1029 <p>Thanks for the continued radness -- using along with Cake 1.3 for a budget app I'm developing!</p> Thanks for the continued radness — using along with Cake 1.3 for a budget app I’m developing!

]]> By: Seidr http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1028 Seidr Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:43:18 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1028 <p>Very damn cool - can't wait to check out Slick!</p> Very damn cool - can’t wait to check out Slick!

]]> By: cpojer http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1027 cpojer Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:59:41 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1027 <p>As for your forge plugins I think it is best to leave them on 1.2 until the final 1.3 release. What you can and probably should do is make a branch for the updated 1.3 code that you merge and put on the forge once we release the final.</p> <p>Please also add a comment whether your plugin can run without compatibility too.</p> As for your forge plugins I think it is best to leave them on 1.2 until the final 1.3 release. What you can and probably should do is make a branch for the updated 1.3 code that you merge and put on the forge once we release the final.

Please also add a comment whether your plugin can run without compatibility too.

]]> By: daminetreg http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1026 daminetreg Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:21:05 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1026 <p>It's Christmas! The Slick and the new from methods are so cool. It's the best framework I know. :) Using it actively!</p> It’s Christmas! The Slick and the new from methods are so cool. It’s the best framework I know. :) Using it actively!

]]> By: SunboX http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1025 SunboX Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:19:49 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1025 <p>*woohoo Sounds great! Can´t wait to get the final! Mootools code is true art. ;o)</p> *woohoo Sounds great! Can´t wait to get the final! Mootools code is true art. ;o)

]]> By: Spi http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1024 Spi Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:53:25 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1024 <p>Yes !!! Mootools is definitively the best way to write JS. Great work guys.</p> Yes !!! Mootools is definitively the best way to write JS. Great work guys.

]]> By: Arian http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1023 Arian Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:51:55 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1023 <p>Great work guys! Was waiting for this and will definitely use 1.3 in my current project and Forge Plugins to test it.</p> Great work guys! Was waiting for this and will definitely use 1.3 in my current project and Forge Plugins to test it.

]]> By: kentaromiura http://mootools.net/blog/2010/04/27/mootools-1-3-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1022 kentaromiura Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:52:32 +0000 http://mootools.net/blog/?p=856#comment-1022 <p>This is an awesome news, I'm going to dig the code now, but I seriously don't have any idea of what reversed combinators is. I tried to search on google for "reversed combinators" and for "srotanibmoc" without a clue, but since they have a cool name they must be something smashing awesome.</p> <p>I'm looking forward for the pattern-based mutators that keeto said should be introduced in 2.0, so I suppose that I will not found anything in here.</p> <p>...Anyway thanks ;)</p> This is an awesome news, I’m going to dig the code now, but I seriously don’t have any idea of what reversed combinators is. I tried to search on google for “reversed combinators” and for “srotanibmoc” without a clue, but since they have a cool name they must be something smashing awesome.

I’m looking forward for the pattern-based mutators that keeto said should be introduced in 2.0, so I suppose that I will not found anything in here.

…Anyway thanks ;)

]]>